Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Username: Password:

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: The future of off trail-hiking?... Updated with the NFS reply  (Read 451 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jacksan

  • Over Nighter
  • ***
  • Karma: 10
  • Posts: 193
  • I Love KY!!!
    • RRG Topo for Android and Garmin
The future of off trail-hiking?... Updated with the NFS reply
« on: February 20, 2022, 12:07:06 PM »

After reading the final RRG Management Plan I have found very little on the future policy regarding off trail hiking:
  • Trail decommissioning activities include preventing use through planting native vegetation and disguising impacted areas with natural debris.
  • Potential Future Management Actions: ...  Educate and broadly distribute information about the locations of designated system trails and discourage off-trail use.
I have written the NFS twice for clarification but have not received a reply. This is concerning.
Does anyone have insight on what the policy will be?

Submitting an official objection, such as objecting to the lack of clear policy, looks to be extremely difficult. Requirements for an objection are:
  • Objections will be accepted only from those who have previously submitted specific written comments regarding the proposed project
  • Issues raised in objections must be based on previously submitted timely, specific written comments

If anyone is qualified to object, there are only a few days left to do so!

I hope there is no reason for concern and that I am just being paranoid.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2022, 08:56:03 PM by jacksan »
Logged
Gorgin' since '74

wsp_scott

  • Back Packer
  • ****
  • Karma: 28
  • Posts: 267
Re: The future of off trail hiking ?
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2022, 09:32:32 PM »

My reading of the "plans" is that the FS is going to try to rehab some of the stupid user trails to make them more hidden, i.e. "discourage". And the FS is going to bring some user trails (Cloud Splitter, Indian Staircase, Douglas Trail, ...) into the "official" system. I don't see that the FS can possibly ban off-trail hiking. Honestly, at this point, I doubt that the FS knows what is going to happen since the plans as specified involve a lot of time and money and I'm not sure either one of those are in the budget.

Long story short, I think it is too early to panic :) Fingers crossed that the Gorge is in better shape 10 years from now than it currently is.
Logged

jacksan

  • Over Nighter
  • ***
  • Karma: 10
  • Posts: 193
  • I Love KY!!!
    • RRG Topo for Android and Garmin
Re: The future of off-trail hiking?
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2022, 07:51:54 PM »

Here is their thoughtful reply...

Off trail foot travel is permitted in the Red River Gorge and across the forest. Although if an area receives repeated constant use on user created trails, it can cause natural and cultural resource issues. For example, Copperas Falls and associated arches. When I first visited Copperas Falls in 2012, there was a single faint trail to the falls and arches. Today with the spread of information on social media, it is a highly visited area. There is a network of heavily trafficked trails that often lead to the same location. The trails to the arches from the valley essentially go straight up the hill, what we call a fall line trail. If a trail is on too steep of a grade, the trail become prone to heavy erosion, especially if no water control features are incorporated into the trail like water bars or rolling grade dips. The goal of the RRG Management Project is to assess these types of trails, adopt them in the system as official, and redesign them so that they are sustainable and can withstand continued use.  There are also concerns with many unmarked user trails leading to Search and Rescue operations. The solution here would be educating the public on the difference between official system trails and user created trails. Were a trail to be adopted into the system and redesigned, redundant user trails that lead to the same location would be naturalized to reduce erosion and limit SAR incidents.

The only circumstance when off trail travel would be prohibited is in locations with sensitive resources. Examples would be locations that contain endangered bat species or perhaps a rockshelter that contains artifacts eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Possibly an area where so much use occurs that it needs time to heal and naturalize. Although by designating a trail it would concentrate the use, negating the need for off trail prohibitions. I do not foresee the need for any blanket off trail travel prohibitions in the Red River Gorge. Any type of prohibitions would be small and very focused.

Balancing the popularity of the RRG with sensitive resources will indeed be a complex endeavor. Iím hopeful through adaptability and with further public input guiding implementation, the USFS can strike that balance.

Sincerely,
Eric Dodd
Acting District Recreation Officer

Logged
Gorgin' since '74

wsp_scott

  • Back Packer
  • ****
  • Karma: 28
  • Posts: 267
Re: The future of off trail-hiking?... Updated with the NFS reply
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2022, 11:50:26 AM »

Thanks for that official update
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Privacy Policy